AI-native threat modeling

AI security assessments.
In minutes.

Turn your AI, RAG or agentic system description into a structured security assessment pack — go-live blockers, risk register, controls, and remediation backlog.

Microsoft
ServiceNow
OpenAI
Internal RAG Assistant
SharePoint · ServiceNow · Azure OpenAI
RAGToolsSSO
System Intake
Threat Analysis
✓ trust boundaries mapped
 
AI Analysis
74/100
Risk score
Go / No-go verdict
14 threats identified
18 remediations
OWASP · MITRE · NIST mapped
Security Assessment Pack

Designed for modern AI delivery stacks

Drel helps security and product teams review GenAI, RAG and agentic systems built with the model providers, cloud platforms and engineering tools they already use.

OpenAIGitHubAWS BedrockAnthropicDatadogAzure OpenAILangChainMistral AIOktaGoogle GeminiSupabasexAISalesforceGoogle CloudClerkQwenSnowflakeNVIDIAHugging FaceAuth0ElevenLabsJiraDatabricksStripeConfluenceServiceNowHashiCorpVercel
100+
AI-specific threat scenarios
9
Security frameworks mapped
20+
Controls per assessment
<5min
Time to first assessment pack

Built for every AI system type

The problem

AI teams ship faster than security can assess.

AppSec and security architecture teams are not staffed to manually threat-model every AI, RAG, or agentic system. Traditional threat modeling tools were not designed for LLM trust boundaries, retrieval authorization, or agentic tool use. Assessments pile up. Systems go live without proper security sign-off.

The solution

Describe your AI system. Answer 8 questions. Get a structured AI Security Assessment Pack in minutes — specific enough for a security architect to use in a real assessment.

Not generic AppSec

Built specifically for RAG pipelines, agentic workflows, and LLM-powered features. Not a cheaper IriusRisk. Not a chatbot with a UI. AI-native threat modeling from the ground up.

What you get

A real security assessment. Not a report template.

Every output is specific to your architecture — named blockers with validation tests, threats mapped to OWASP and MITRE, controls with implementation guidance, and a pre-answered enterprise security questionnaire.

Go / Go with conditions / Do not go verdict
Named blockers with validation tests
100+ threats mapped to OWASP LLM, MITRE ATLAS, MAESTRO
Controls mapped to NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, AIUC-1 & EU AI Act
Remediation backlog with acceptance criteria
Pre-answered enterprise security questionnaire
Internal RAG Assistant
AI Security Assessment Pack · Generated in 4s
Go with conditions
Go-live blockers
Indirect prompt injection via SharePoint documents
Validation: Inject adversarial instructions into a SharePoint document and verify the RAG system does not execute them
Threat register
Indirect Prompt Injection
OWASP LLM01
Critical
Retrieval ACL Bypass
MITRE AML.T0054
High
Identity Propagation Failure
MAESTRO L3
High
Excessive LLM Agency
OWASP LLM08
Medium
Recommended controls
prevInput sanitization pipeline before retrieval
prevACL enforcement at chunk retrieval layer
detePrompt injection detection classifier
Security questionnaire
Is prompt injection mitigated?Pending
Are retrieval ACLs enforced?Pending
Is PII redacted before LLM?Confirmed
Is output logged and auditable?Confirmed
System types

Tailored to your AI architecture

Each system type has its own threat model, risk patterns, and control library — built from the specific trust boundaries of that architecture.

Internal RAG Assistant

Retrieval-Augmented Generation over enterprise knowledge

Employee-facing assistants over SharePoint, Confluence, and ServiceNow introduce unique trust boundaries — retrieval authorization, prompt injection via documents, and identity propagation across the retrieval chain.

OWASP LLM01Indirect prompt injection via indexed documents
MITRE AML.T0054Retrieval ACL bypass — chunks returned without permission check
MAESTRO L3Identity not propagated from user session to retrieval layer
Internal RAG Assistant — Architecture
UserRAG AppOrchestratorAI SearchVector DBSharePointDocumentsServiceNowKnowledgeConfluenceWikiAzureOpenAIquery + tokenembed queryindexindexindexchunksprompt + ctxresponsePrompt injectionACL bypass
Agent with Tools

Agentic systems with write access and tool execution

LLM agents with API access to GitHub, Slack, Jira, and PagerDuty require explicit policy gates, approval boundaries, and action authorization. Without them, a single injected instruction can trigger cascading write actions.

OWASP LLM08Excessive agency — write actions without human approval gate
MITRE AML.T0051Tool call injection via adversarial user input
MAESTRO L5Privilege escalation through chained tool invocations
Agent with Tools — Architecture
UserClaudeAgentPolicyGateGitHubCode writeSlackNotifyJiraTicketsPagerDutyIncidentstaskaction reqwritepostcreatealertExcessive agencyNo approval gate
B2B SaaS AI Feature

Customer-facing AI in multi-tenant SaaS products

AI features embedded in B2B SaaS products must enforce strict tenant isolation, prevent cross-tenant data leakage, and produce go-live evidence for enterprise security questionnaires.

OWASP LLM06Tenant data isolation failure — context bleeds across sessions
MITRE AML.T0048PII exfiltration via LLM output in shared inference
NIST AI RMFMissing go-live evidence for enterprise security assessment
B2B SaaS AI Feature — Architecture
TENANT AUserTENANT BUserOktaTenant ctxAzureOpenAISalesforceCRM dataStripeBillingPostgreSQLCustomer DBsessionsessiontenant ctxqueryreadqueryTenant isolationPII leakage
Framework coverage

The standards your team already uses.

Every threat, control, and remediation item maps directly — so the output lands in your assessment without translation.

OWASP LLM Top 10
OWASP Agentic Top 10
MITRE ATLAS
MAESTRO
NIST AI RMF
ISO/IEC 42001
AIUC-1
ENISA AI Threat Landscape
EU AI Act

Ready to assess your AI system?

No signup required for the demo. Generate your first AI Security Assessment Pack in minutes.